Categories
Restaurant Life

Why I Might Have To Retire From Restaurants

Even the greatest athletes inevitably face their own mortality, their impermanence in the history of sport. Some players make the difficult decision to retire at the peak of their game, like Michael Jordan did after his last championship in 1998. (As a native Chicagoan, I refuse to acknowledge his brief, unsuccessful cameo years later with the Washington Wizards.) Other players stubbornly slog it out until their athletic abilities erode to the point where they aren’t competitive anymore. Retirement makes the decision for them. 

Restaurant careers follow a similar trajectory to an athlete’s. We start working in the industry at a very young age, we get caught up in the allure of instant gratification and then we get out of the game when our minds and bodies can’t take any more punishment. For every hospitality zealot who believes in the transformative power of restaurant service there are hundreds, if not thousands, of others like me who enjoy restaurant work but wish there was an easier way to make ends meet. Our feet hurt. Our income stagnates seasonally. We just can’t deal with these fucking people anymore. But most of us show up day after day and keep doing it because we have more bills due than available egress exits. 

Lately, I’ve been trying to envision what the restaurant world will look like after the Coronavirus pandemic has abated. My background as a server makes me particularly sensitive to how this crisis threatens the livelihoods of front-of-house workers who, like me, are accustomed to generating our income from tips. Serving jobs can be very lucrative, but since income is typically based on a percentage of sales the restaurant needs to remain busy to keep the cash flowing. If restaurants aren’t busy in the near term because guests are reticent about dining in public spaces, tipped workers are doomed to face serious financial shortfall. 

Though I acknowledge its shortcomings, the tipping system has endured in part because FOH workers don’t trust restaurant owners to pay them their worth. When I worked in Hong Kong, it was horrifying how easily owners could misappropriate funds from service charges that were automatically added to every check without transparency. Only a fraction of those service charges ended up in the staff’s pockets.

In the U.S., there’s been a growing resentment toward servers for their escalating salaries, some arguing that it comes at the expense of the kitchen staff. Managers—who have more responsibility but whose salaries often lag the tip pool—harbor animosity as well. I don’t think I’ve worked a single restaurant job where I haven’t been reminded regularly that I make too much money.

Retire-Restaurants

But how can we realistically expect restaurant owners to pay FOH properly when they routinely underpay their cooks? Of course, many owners will cry poverty and lament rising costs or narrowing profit margins. But it’s become accepted that many of the most successful chefs and owners pay their kitchen staff below industry standards, openly exploiting the fact that young chefs will work for less money to build their resumes. Shouldn’t the busiest restaurants pay the most to their BOH staff? They should, but they don’t. 

Assuming the Coronavirus pandemic doesn’t kill tipping, the deficit in sales going forward might. It’s simple math. You can’t make money if you don’t have tables. Not only that, if restaurant owners are only legally able to fill their dining rooms at 50% capacity, then revenues will also likely be halved, and half the staff will remain furloughed. These are generous estimates. Sales cut in half mean tips cut in half. Many servers will prefer to continue to collect unemployment rather than returning to a restaurant that’s breathing on one lung. 

Assuming nothing changes in the law between now and reopening, most FOH staff still costs owners less than a minimum wage per hour. Most states have “tip credits” that apply to certain workers—some as low as $2.13 per hour—who rely on tips for the majority of their income. Some government officials have even threatened to rescind unemployment benefits for workers that refuse to report back to their jobs, as the Governor of Iowa did recently. If the same officials mandate limits on seating capacity in restaurants, they’re forcing tipped workers to walk the plank. 

As dining culture has become increasingly commoditized, restaurants have become whorehouses for capitalism. Tipped workers live off the crumbs left by the affluent diners who recklessly squander obscene amounts of money on extravagant meals. Our jobs have become increasingly geared toward enabling that recklessness. Servers and bartenders scramble for jobs in the busiest restaurants possible. If you’re lucky enough to find one of these jobs, the upper-echelon can earn six-figure salaries. I’ve been fortunate to be employed in such jobs during my career, and it’s made putting aside the years of psychological and physical wear a lot easier. 

I guess you could say I’ve been part of the 1% of waitstaff, but I’ve worked hard to get to this level. Restaurants have become so much more important than they once were, and pay should be commensurate. For people like me who’ve dedicated ourselves to the craft of table service, a future of restaurants with fewer tables or fewer guests would be apocalyptic. This situation is more lethal than past crises like 9/11 or economic downturns like The Great Recession. We’ve been stepping around these piles of horse manure for a long time. Now we’re standing knee deep in it. 

Some have suggested this would be an opportune moment for restaurateurs to introduce more hospitality-included models. Decoupling servers pay from aggregate sales could help retain more FOH staff who might be tempted to leave if business levels remain depressed. It’s hard to find a formula that works for everyone, especially when the economy is so unpredictable. The reason that many hospitality-included models have collapsed in the past is because the salaries assigned to FOH at many of these restaurants have not been able to compete with restaurants that have tipping models. The market dictates where the talent goes. Perhaps there will be less discrepancy in a post-COVID world and these models can become more viable?

Retire-Restaurants-2

It’s important to remember that thousands of people who otherwise would’ve fled the industry through the years have stayed in the workforce because it affords them an opportunity to earn competitive wages. The fact that these FOH jobs have historically paid so well fortifies the talent pool. But the industry cannot continue to attract talent without maintaining attractive salaries for these jobs. It’s basic supply and demand. Exodus of talent from FOH ranks—especially in fine dining where most of the “white-collar” restaurant jobs are—will be a significant aftershock if business doesn’t recover to pre-COVID levels. The golden age of restaurant tipping may have come to an unceremonious end.

It may be premature to call this my Jerry McGuire moment. It’s impossible to predict the circumstances around my being asked to return to work, but the odds of restaurant life returning to normal anytime soon are slim to none. Every restaurant worker has always understood how expendable they are. We’re treated like mercenaries, and, to be honest, most of us embrace it. If we get fired, so what? We just move on to the next place.

Having fewer people to serve, however, is uncharted territory. This existential threat will undoubtedly stifle growth in the coming months but, as it always is, the restaurant industry will be resilient. The question then becomes: How long can people like me who’ve ridden the ship for so long hold onto the hull while it takes in water?

As the industry has grown—and I say this from personal experience—it’s become more than a temporary job or a supplemental income for many of us. Hospitality has become a legitimate career. But there’s a serious risk that this crisis delegitimizes our industry and undercuts the progress we’ve made. One virus may have taken all of that away, and it might take me with it.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
Categories
Restaurant Life

Restaurants Shouldn’t Have to “Cook Their Way Out” of the COVID Crisis

A few days after 9/11, I returned to my restaurant job. I’d recently started working as a waiter at an upscale Italian restaurant in downtown Manhattan. The air was still musty and ripe with the aroma of burning jet fuel and smoldering steel. Yet, there we were. Serving people food for a profit.

This one particular night stands out in my memory because, shortly after the restaurant re-opened, we had a guest order a $500 bottle of Sassicaia. Under normal circumstances, it would’ve been cause for celebration. That night, however, given the backdrop of carnage and horror, it felt grotesque for someone to be so frivolous. First responders and emergency workers were still sifting through rubble at Ground Zero. The devastation we were experiencing all around us made it hard for our staff to muster warmth for the few guests we were tasked with serving.

We had a skeleton crew that night. The police and military had blockaded swaths of the city. Working with a leaner team meant that service might be less fluid than normal. We hoped that guests would be more forgiving under the circumstances, and most people were. But when the sommelier struggled to locate the bottle of Sassicaia for this table after ten or fifteen minutes, the guest who’d ordered it became irate.

The staff stood by in disbelief as the man reprimanded the sommelier for not having retrieved his wine sooner. Even though the city was crumbling just miles away—thousands of lives lost—this individual felt entitled to more expeditious service. We shut our mouths, swallowed our pride and took the high road. Even in times of crisis, we knew, that’s life in restaurants.

There is a figurative switch you have to throw when you serve people—everyone who’s ever taken an order in a restaurant understands this. Working in hospitality requires that you master control of that switch. You don’t get too many free passes in the restaurant industry, so you cannot allow that switch to short circuit.

As the COVID-19 pandemic spreads, waiters have become disposable, which in some ways is fortunate because it would be virtually impossible to act like everything is normal under the circumstances. How do we put on our “jazz hands” when we have to wash them every time we touch anything?? Income losses have been crippling for front of house staff, but many of our comrades in the back of house continue to prepare takeout food under the most adverse conditions for hungry patrons sheltered at home.

Long before Anthony Bourdain told us so, cooks have always been cut from a different cloth. They’re taught to put their noses down and fight through whatever challenges come their way. The new garde manger guy no-call, no-showed. The dishwashing machine just broke down. A food delivery arrived incomplete. Chefs don’t make excuses because no one will ever accept them. People want their food, and they want it now.

Some restaurants have little choice but to remain open in some limited capacity. A friend of mine who manages a new cafe in Sonoma told me that he’s stressed to the owners to focus on “the social capital” that can be earned by continuing to serve the community. “Local people are grateful that we’re here for them, and many have said they’re excited to come back when life returns to normal.”

The way that some restaurants have adapted to the challenges of the crisis exemplifies the resourcefulness of our industry leaders. One can’t help but be inspired by the way that some independent restaurants like Addo in Seattle have transformed their full-service business into a grocery-takeout-delivery hybrid model, including offering subscription services to generate more consistent revenue. Addo’s chef and owner Eric Rivera is finding ways to keep his staff on the payroll while also extending health benefits to protect its welfare.

Nick Kokonas and his Chicago-based restaurant group that includes Next and Alinea are deploying technologies using Tock, their proprietary ticketing system, in innovative ways—streamlining kitchen operations to sell comfort food delivered at a fraction of their normal prix fixe prices. Like Chef Rivera, Mr. Kokonas and his partners have been able to recall a quarter of their furloughed staff with plans to take back more as they grow their takeout business.

But these triumphs don’t feel as triumphant as they should. It seems unfair to ask restaurants to “cook their way out” of this crisis. People are dying by the tens of thousands worldwide from the Coronavirus, and we shouldn’t have to put our workforce in harm’s way while the rest of society—save healthcare professionals—hermetically seals itself in a sanitized bubble. The most vulnerable among us are the poor and immigrant populations. Many of the faceless people cooking and delivering your food are undocumented, a population that has been systematically forsaken by our directionless immigration policies.

Quarantined people, many confronted with their own lack of cooking skills, must learn to manage their hormonal cravings for restaurant food. Instead, they just absolutely have to have that dish they love so much from such-and-such trendy restaurant, and ‘thank god they’re finally on Uber Eats now.’ Everyone’s patting themselves on the back for supporting local businesses, as if their twenty dollar delivery will even come close to stemming the tide for these ailing businesses.

Meanwhile most of these exposed restaurant workers are uninsured and paid wages that wouldn’t cover a tiny fraction of the medical expenses they would incur if they contracted the virus. How can restaurant owners expect these people to work without providing proper health insurance during one of the worst pandemic crises in human history? All the GoFundMes in the world can’t cover the potential catastrophic medical expenses that might result from exposing so many of these uninsured restaurant workers to infection. At best, those funds will be like providing boxes of band-aids to hundreds of thousands of restaurant workers that are bleeding to death.

If we’ve learned anything from the COVID-19 crisis it’s that restaurants are essential to our cities’ lifeblood. If you live in any metropolitan area, you can feel its arteries hardening. Our social behaviors are so intertwined with our restaurant communities. Without them, we have no place to root for our local teams, to meet Tinder dates, to impress clientele or to feed our Instagram. Let’s treat them that way and leverage the maximum power of the public purse to provide the necessary triage in these unprecedented times.

The reality is that restaurants have mutated into a perverse playground for affluent people to display privilege at the expense of underpaid labor. This crisis is exposing that lob-sided power dynamic in an unsettling way with images of delivery workers crowding the streets waiting to deliver high end cuisine to quarantined people in the wealthiest zip codes. Hospitality can be a noble pursuit, but what is noble about poor people risking their lives to deliver fully packaged tasting menus to the least needy people in our society? It should be the other way around.

If we expect our restaurant soldiers to keep fighting for a cause they believe in, we should follow the lead of great chefs like Jose Andrés, who continues to mobilize his non-profit restaurant armada, The World Central Kitchen, for charitable causes by providing hot meals to the parts of the world that are suffering. Chef Andrés’ mission elevates the work of chefs and hospitality professionals by leading with compassion—not by the need to cater to the whims of rich people—and by demonstrating that the restaurant industry doesn’t just exist to sell us food. Restaurants are pillars of our community. They need our help when calamity strikes, and we must find ways of protecting them that go beyond simple patronage.